|
credit lost
![[it]](/s/countries/it.gif) Shadow Hawkins on Monday, 17 March 2003 13:02:24
why after putting a new endpoint in did I loose 25 credits?? after 4 weeks of uptime...it is too much according to me...even because I've a dynamic ip. How can I do?
2003-03-17 13:02:24 Posted a message to the forum
2003-03-17 12:57:20 Moved tunnel from 80.xx.xx.xx to 80.xx.xx.xx -25
2003-03-13 01:15:25 Tunnel endpoint 2001:768:1900:xx::xx pinged for 4 weeks 5
2003-03-06 01:15:24 Tunnel endpoint 2001:768:1900:xx::xx pinged for 3 weeks 5
2003-02-27 01:15:25 Tunnel endpoint 2001:768:1900:xx::xx pinged for 2 weeks 5
2003-02-20 01:15:31 Tunnel endpoint 2001:768:1900:xx::xx pinged for 1 week 5
Thank you
Andrea Machisio
credit lost
![[fi]](/s/countries/fi.gif) Shadow Hawkins on Monday, 17 March 2003 17:27:49
Hi,
https://www.sixxs.net/faq/?faq=credits says :
The current cost list is:
Moving a tunnel's endpoint debits 25
so it's actually correct?
credit lost
Shadow Hawkins on Monday, 17 March 2003 17:44:32
hiya, I've already seen that...but I have posted this here 'cause I hope something can be changed, since it isn't my fault if I have a dynamic ip, and it's bad to loose 30 credits at once because of blackout...anyway rules are rules, I know...don't want to open a debate :7- , just to ask kindly if it possibile to do something to avoid this.
credit lost
Well we are in the process of rounding up the Control Tool which does allow for dynamic IP's. The whole point behind this is simply that we don't want to send traffic to unsuspecting endpoints and get a load of ZoneAlarm 'abuse' reports.
|
![[ch]](/s/countries/ch.gif)
on Monday, 17 March 2003 19:26:00
Posting is only allowed when you are