Good bye
Carmen Sandiego on Thursday, 08 May 2003 17:07:10
First i thought this is serious tb, but now i have feeling like you don't want many new users. My problem was i got refused subnet after 1 week uptime, now i have 2 weeks uptime and i still can't get it. Sorry im not going to wait another week. You service is not free, time is not free. So if you want to offer free service then do it so.
I need tb from my own educaton. I think it's wrong to refuse getting subnet after so long uptime. I dont' know why it didn't ping but it's pinging all this time, at least your logs show so. If 2 weeks uptime is not enough to get subnet i consider you as not serious tb and you are not good for me.
Good bye
:?
Good bye
Jeroen Massar on Friday, 09 May 2003 12:03:40 You service is not free, time is not free.
Our service is free or did you donate anything to the project?
Our time is indeed not, but we still do this for free.
I dont' know why it didn't ping but it's pinging all this time,
Be glad that I don't post the ping graphs with gaping holes in it and an average of 195.07 ms latency and ofcourse nice loss spikes that last days.
Maybe it is a good idea to make those statistics public at least people won't be able to make odd accusations then.
Be glad that it is there and that we do invest time in it.
Ofcourse anybody is free to go.
Btw: if we weren't serious about all this it wouldn't still be running :)
Good bye
Shadow Hawkins on Friday, 09 May 2003 14:16:21
why don't people write kind and polite emails to staff-members if they experience problems with their tunnels?
as i said earlier, my tunnel is fresh, but all i see in this forum are nice and polite answer from jeroen to user-questions. also what i see from top-uptime stats, sixxs is damn stable with their tunnels. and, btw, in my research prior to requesting my tunnel earlier this year, i definitely found no tunnelbroker with this a-class support, tutorials and really, really nice web-interface.
sixxs, i like you.
sebastian
nb: i don't do this for credits :)
Good bye
Shadow Hawkins on Friday, 09 May 2003 17:40:27
The staff is spending much more time than you can imagine I think :)
They're doing a great job.
I had some latency issues myself too.
Then I posted it in the forum here, and tried reloading some stuff in my interfaces.. I rebooted and looked at the stats.. latency was now at 30ms or something :)
Too bad ip6.arpa is not working with Concepts ICT BV POP though.
Good bye
Jeroen Massar on Friday, 09 May 2003 19:54:13
Complaints about ip6.arpa should go to 6bone@isi.edu :)
Btw, SixXS already has it:
jeroen@purgatory:~$ dig @ns1.sixxs.net 3.0.7.0.0.4.e.f.f.3.ip6.int
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
3.0.7.0.0.4.e.f.f.3.ip6.int. 604800 IN SOA ns1.sixxs.net. hostmaster.sixxs.net. 2003050606 10800 3600 2419200 604800
jeroen@purgatory:~$ dig @ns1.sixxs.net 3.0.7.0.0.4.e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
3.0.7.0.0.4.e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa. 604800 IN SOA ns1.sixxs.net. hostmaster.sixxs.net. 2003050606 10800 3600 2419200 604800
Both already there, the system has it now only the delegation from the top :)
Good bye
Shadow Hawkins on Friday, 09 May 2003 20:54:17
Shouldn't "dig 3.0.7.0.0.4.e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa" , without @ns1.sixxs.net work?
If I do it without, it's not working here
:?
Good bye
Jeroen Massar on Saturday, 10 May 2003 00:36:30
Read the last line about the delegation from the top.
Or compare:
dig +trace 3.0.7.0.0.4.e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa
with:
dig +trace 3.0.7.0.0.4.e.f.f.3.ip6.int
Posting is only allowed when you are logged in. |