|
Any reasons against going productive with LAMP stack?
![[de]](/s/countries/de.gif) Shadow Hawkins on Wednesday, 06 February 2008 12:32:15
As the root servers have ipv6 entries and my zone also has
ipv6 glue records, i want to go live with my webhosting infrastructure.
Are there any reasons not doing that? The software i use (apache, postfix, courier, vsftpd, sshd) is ipv6 ready for a long time now...
Any reasons against going productive with LAMP stack?
![[nl]](/s/countries/nl.gif) Shadow Hawkins on Wednesday, 06 February 2008 17:00:24
I think you should go for it, it will be a good experiment.
Just remember one thing: your firewall (if you use one) is probably configured for IPv4 only. I see this mistake many times. People start playing with IPv6 and forget that their well tuned firewall works fine on IPv4 but is completely open for IPv6 :-)
S.
Any reasons against going productive with LAMP stack?
![[be]](/s/countries/be.gif) Shadow Hawkins on Thursday, 27 March 2008 17:09:23
When you have gone live on IPv6, could you please provide us with some URLs that are
available then with IPv6 (including DNS) only ? The shortlist i've got now is roughly:
ftp://ftp.belnet.be
http://ripe.net
http://arin.net
Any reasons against going productive with LAMP stack?
Shadow Hawkins on Monday, 31 March 2008 19:00:30
Well the infrastructure is on v6 now. But as my customers dont have v6 at the moment, there are only my services available via v6.
Webmail, POP, IMAP, SMTP, SMS and the status pages.
As the are only usable for my customers and i think adds are not allowed here ;), i dont post the urls.
|
Posting is only allowed when you are