|
Sluggish performance on AICCU compared to static?
![[se]](/s/countries/se.gif) Shadow Hawkins on Sunday, 28 March 2010 14:21:36
Hey,
I just have a question, is the performance over AICCU/AYIYA supposed to be that much lower than on a static tunnel?
I had some trouble getting my static tunnel to work under OpenWRT backfire rc1. So i switched to AYIYA and the performance dropped from getting around 80 - 90 Mbit/sec through the static tunnel towards for example ftp.sunet.se down to around 20Mbit/sec.
If this is the case then i will surely make an effort to get my static tunnel back online instead.
Anyone has any ideas?
Thanks
Lars
Sluggish performance on AICCU compared to static?
![[de]](/s/countries/de.gif) Shadow Hawkins on Wednesday, 07 April 2010 00:15:32
AYIYA mode works inside userspace while the usual static setup uses an in-kernel tunnel driver. I noticed higher CPU usage with AYIYA, so I switched my dynamic tunnel to heartbeat, which also uses an in-kernel tunnel and uses almost no CPU.
Try 'heartbeat' before going back to static.
Sluggish performance on AICCU compared to static?
Shadow Hawkins on Wednesday, 07 April 2010 17:46:42
It worked perfectly!
Thank you so much for the tip!
Now i'm back up to around 90Mbit/sec again. :-]
|
Posting is only allowed when you are